Partner-Craft POV Engagement Series
[Field: Partner name] | [Field: Vendor name] | [Field: Date] | [Field: Engagement lead]
This engagement is not a vendor briefing. It is not a training program. It is not a generic partner kit.
It is a partner methodology, built around your business, your clients, and your market.
What this is NOT
What this IS
We learn your world before anything is built. How you sell, who your clients are, where deals stall, what the vendor has given you and how useful it actually has been.
Output: Completed Discovery Questionnaire
With that context, we build the engagement methodology around your motion. Sessions, worksheets, facilitation guides, and report templates shaped for your client conversations.
Output: Full methodology package, white-labeled
You go to market with a structured, repeatable methodology you helped shape. What works and what does not gets fed back in. The methodology improves with use.
Output: Partner-ready, client-facing delivery capability
01 — Honesty About what is working and what is not. Polished answers produce generic methodology. The more candid you are about where things break down, the more useful what we build together will be.
02 — Real Conversations Access to actual client conversations, not sanitized versions. The language your clients use, the objections they raise, the questions that kill deals. That is what the methodology gets built around.
03 — Decision Access A point of contact who can make decisions. If every output needs three layers of internal approval before we can move, the engagement stalls. We need someone in the room who can say yes.
04 — Time Realistic session commitments, kept. The methodology cannot be built in a single workshop. It takes structured sessions with preparation between them.
The vendor is here as a resource. The partner’s client relationship drives the room.
The vendor provides:
The vendor does not:
Use the archetype-specific variant from the Archetype Variants section below
| Session | Focus | Who’s in the Room | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kickoff | Scope alignment, methodology overview, partner discovery | Partner lead, vendor contact, MM | Completed Discovery Questionnaire |
| Session 2 | Archetype-specific: client problem framing and market translation | Partner lead, MM | Session output summary |
| Session 3 | Methodology build: facilitation guides and client materials drafted | Partner lead, MM, vendor on request | Draft methodology package |
| Session 4 | Dry run: partner leads simulated client session | Partner lead, MM | Refined methodology, partner ready to deliver |
| Session 5* | Final review and white-label packaging | Partner lead, MM, vendor | Complete engagement package |
* Session count varies by archetype. See archetype variants below.
01 — Confidentiality What is said in these sessions shapes the methodology. It does not go back to vendor headquarters as market intelligence. Partner and client context stays in this room.
02 — IP Ownership The methodology and all client-facing materials belong to the partner. White-labeled, partner-branded, governed by the engagement agreement. Not a vendor asset.
03 — Speed of Decisions We move at the speed of decisions, not the speed of approvals. If something needs to go through three layers of sign-off before we can proceed, flag it early.
04 — No Surprises If something is not working in the engagement, say so in the room. The retrospective at engagement close exists for honest feedback. So does every session opening.
| Time | Activity |
|---|---|
| 0:00 – 0:15 | Welcome and context setting: why we are here, what this engagement produces, how the sessions work |
| 0:15 – 0:45 | Discovery Questionnaire walkthrough: Sections 1–2 together, capturing honest answers |
| 0:45 – 1:05 | Open discussion: what is the one thing you most want this methodology to solve? |
| 1:05 – 1:20 | Next steps and session scheduling: confirming dates, identifying the right people, assigning pre-work |
Agreed Next Steps
[Field: Engagement lead name and contact] [Field: mcphail.pro]
Build it for the partner. Then make the vendor earn their place in it.
Slide 07 — Session Plan
Use the version below that matches your engagement. Replace the Session Plan table in Slide 07 with the relevant archetype variant.
e.g. Mimic | Typical duration: 6–8 weeks
| Session | Focus | Who’s in the Room | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kickoff | Scope alignment, partner discovery questionnaire | Partner lead, vendor contact, MM | Completed questionnaire |
| Session 2 | Market translation: how does the vendor story land in this partner’s client conversations? | Partner lead, MM | Session summary |
| Session 3 | Methodology build: facilitation guides and client-facing materials | Partner lead, MM, vendor on request | Draft methodology package |
| Session 4 | Dry run: partner leads simulated client session with MM coaching | Partner lead, MM | Refined methodology, partner delivery-ready |
e.g. WI-SUN Alliance, Toyota Tsusho context | Typical duration: 8–10 weeks
| Session | Focus | Who’s in the Room | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kickoff | Scope alignment, partner discovery questionnaire | Partner lead, vendor contact, MM | Completed questionnaire |
| Session 2 | OT environment mapping: where IT/OT boundaries sit in the partner’s client landscape | Partner lead, OT contact, MM | Environment map |
| Session 3 | Buyer mapping: decision-maker chain across IT, OT engineering, and procurement | Partner lead, MM | Buyer map and champion strategy |
| Session 4 | Methodology build: OT-credible language and reference architecture | Partner lead, MM, vendor | Draft methodology package |
| Session 5 | Dry run with OT-specific client scenario | Partner lead, MM | Refined methodology, partner delivery-ready |
e.g. WitnessAI | Typical duration: 8–10 weeks
| Session | Focus | Who’s in the Room | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kickoff | Scope alignment, partner discovery questionnaire | Partner lead, vendor contact, MM | Completed questionnaire |
| Session 2 | Regulatory and sensitivity mapping: compliance and cultural constraints in play | Partner lead, legal/risk contact, MM | Constraint and sensitivity map |
| Session 3 | Narrative development: building an AI story that is safe to tell in this market | Partner lead, MM, vendor | Draft narrative and positioning |
| Session 4 | Methodology build: materials with data residency and governance language embedded | Partner lead, MM | Draft methodology package |
| Session 5 | Stakeholder readiness review: who needs preparation before partner goes to clients | Partner lead, MM, vendor | Refined methodology, partner delivery-ready |
e.g. Keyfactor, OmniTrust | Typical duration: 6–8 weeks
| Session | Focus | Who’s in the Room | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kickoff | Scope alignment, partner discovery questionnaire | Partner lead, vendor contact, MM | Completed questionnaire |
| Session 2 | Crypto literacy assessment: where partner and clients sit on PQC awareness | Partner lead, MM | Literacy and readiness map |
| Session 3 | Discovery methodology build: how partner leads a certificate and crypto inventory conversation | Partner lead, MM, vendor | Discovery session guide |
| Session 4 | Roadmap and narrative build: the quantum risk story for non-technical executives | Partner lead, MM | Refined methodology, partner delivery-ready |
e.g. Northern Tech Mender | Typical duration: 6–8 weeks
| Session | Focus | Who’s in the Room | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kickoff | Scope alignment, partner discovery questionnaire | Partner lead, vendor contact, MM | Completed questionnaire |
| Session 2 | Current state mapping: how partner’s clients manage patching and vulnerability remediation | Partner lead, MM | Current state baseline |
| Session 3 | Managed service design: recurring service model built around vendor capability | Partner lead, MM, vendor | Managed service framework |
| Session 4 | Methodology build: client-facing materials and delivery framework | Partner lead, MM | Refined methodology, partner delivery-ready |
e.g. Agentic SOC vendors | Typical duration: 8–10 weeks
| Session | Focus | Who’s in the Room | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kickoff | Scope alignment, partner discovery questionnaire | Partner lead, vendor contact, MM | Completed questionnaire |
| Session 2 | Current SOC state: what client outsources, what they own, where the gaps are | Partner lead, SOC contact, MM | SOC state map |
| Session 3 | Transition methodology: how partner leads client from MSSP dependency to internal capability | Partner lead, MM | Transition framework draft |
| Session 4 | Agentic capability framing: building partner confidence in autonomous detection and response | Partner lead, MM, vendor | Capability narrative |
| Session 5 | Dry run with realistic SOC transition scenario | Partner lead, MM | Refined methodology, partner delivery-ready |